.
May 7, 2010
The new way to select ASB and class officers has the potential to be an integral part of future elections. While the idea of having videos of candidates’ interviews may be better than live speeches, as were done in the past, the execution of this new process, along with parts of the process itself, can be improved. Granted that this is the first time trying the new process, it’s only natural that the process is not yet perfect; the Hatchet staff merely wants to make suggestions for the future.
1. Require candidates to make brief speeches.
Speeches are fun and personal; they show the candidate’s character. But when they are done live, viewers have a hard time hearing what applicants took the time and effort to write and memorize. Recorded speeches can eliminate this issue as long as the sound quality of the video is good.
This year candidates weren’t required to prepare or recite a formal speech. Rather, they answered questions that were supposed to reveal who they are and how well-qualified they were for the desired office. Although this is a good supplement, speeches add flair and vitality to the video and the candidates themselves. Prepared speeches also increase difficulty to the election process, showing how well candidates can stretch themselves, which they need to do as ASB and class officers.
Questions hit only the surface of what voters may want to know about candidates, but they can also address points candidates neglected to mention in their speeches. The seemingly random ones reveal how well candidates react and respond, along with adding a fun element to the Q&A format. With speeches, this method can effectively inform voters about their possible ASB and class officers.
2. Fix technical issues.
As The Hatchet staff discussed the new election process, a handful of students complained it was difficult to hear the video. However, another handful of students heard the video just fine. A microphone would make sure candidates could be heard.
3. Make slight changes to the subtitles.
It undoubtedly helped to include subtitles to the video, so good job. However, their color and size made them hard to see. Although orange matches our school colors, the contrast between the subtitles and background was not stark enough. Along with changing the text color, larger font would make the subtitles easier to read.
We hope these suggestions will be considered for upcoming elections so that future voters know exactly who they are supporting.
Until next year…
Loading ...